Michael Smith in the community

Terrorism, Gay Marriage, or Global Warming bigger threat?

A: None of the above. It’s debt that’s more likely to have a negative impact on your way of life. Both personal and government debt are likely to drag the economy down and cost you your job if changes aren’t made to tax policy and credit practices.

Gary Shilling discusses the coming recession in Forbes. I’m not sure I agree completely with his emphasis on the housing market – I think credit card debt is as much an issue. But either way, much of our apparent prosperity is built on a shaky foundation of debt and inflated real estate. I don’t propose direct government intervention in the consumer credit market but tax policy shouldn’t shield creditors from the risks inherent when they extend credit to questionable cardholders. If they extend credit imprudently, they should have to bear the risk of that loss without tax offset. That’s at least one of the reasons we need to get away from a system of income taxation, and go to a system of consumption taxes.

Likewise, our government debt is dragging us all down. At roughly $30,000 of debt for every man, woman, and child, just the interest could fund health insurance for us all. We need to make sure that the money we take from Americans, from whatever tax source, is used productively, not merely to provide investment income to the big-money investors (many foreign) who finance our frivolous government.

Michael


Previous: -- Next:
Back to Blog
Link to this article


Comment from John Eyler:

A consumption tax is a great idea. I’ve joined the Fair Tax group. They have an odd but at least workable proposal listed as HB 25 and S25. Further why would I want to use that money to provide health care. Fix the system don’t throw money at it.


Posted by John Eyler    Sep 26, 06:05 PM    #

Comment from Michael Smith:

You’re absolutely right John. If “we” had the money back from the interest on the national debt it should be the taxpayers to decide how to spend it. I might buy health insurance, you might invest for retirement, and my neighbor might buy cigarettes and bourbon. The choice should be ours individually, not by government committee.


Posted by Michael Smith    Sep 26, 07:53 PM    #

Comment from Paul Davis:

The comments about health care are a bit surprising to me. I’m going to argue that we not give any more tax money to insurance companies. Between Health Savings Accounts and the new medicare drug scam, I think the insurance companies are getting enough government subsidies.

Ok, on to my real comment ;-)
Although I think our debt is a problem, I also think we should be objective about it. About half of the debt is actually owed to the Social Security fund. Of the remaining half, a huge amount is held in the hands of citizens in savings bonds and t-bills.
The biggest problem with a high debt load is that we are collecting a huge amount of money to repay it instead of keeping that money circulating through the economy. Imagine the boost to the economy if $30k/person was out being spent.

Eliminating/reducing the national can fix the social security crisis and the economy. Bonus point for long terms economic strength. Now for a politician that can see further than the next election cycle….

Some interesting bits, Even though we have the highest debt of any country, we rank number 35 in debt/GDP. So, its not all bad.
Ranking of total debt:
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2079rank.html
Debt as a percentage of GDP:
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html


Posted by Paul Davis    Oct 2, 05:41 AM    #

Favorite Posts:

Other Blogs:

Links:

Feeds - SFP updates for your homepage:

Previous Posts: